A few comments:
Template designers - Great! I love the idea, this
will make creation of a many-nested dynlayer widget (ie: the tree) somewhat
faster and more robust.. especially for those using asp or cgi to generate
definations of node data.
Dictionary object -
Negative (there has to be right?): aren't we adding
a whole level of complexity which will confuse the heck out of newer DynAPI
users? Also: I read that the dictionary method of defination is also slower..
Posative: could make for faster data transfer to
client browser when defining large numbers of layers. also resulting in less
data transfered (great for those of us with a bandwith cap)
Inline binding: I don't really care how that works
just so long as a means is selected, implemented and stable (ie; doesn't change
again in two weeks)
Question: is the inline defination of layers
faster? if so this will be a massive benifit to those dynamically generating
definations from a database via asp or cgi.
|
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Stable mile-stone release? Doug Melvin
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Stable mile-stone release? Raymond Irving
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Stable mile-stone release? Doug Melvin
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Stable mile-stone release? Raymond Irving
- [Dynapi-Dev] About Bouncing & Growing Text... Raymond Irving
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] About Bouncing & Grow... Doug Melvin
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] About Bouncing &... Raymond Irving
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] About Bouncing &... Doug Melvin
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] About Bounci... Raymond Irving