See below:
--- Leif W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I also think it looks a bit confusing at first, at
> least not intuitive. I
> believe it's just illustrating two things. First,
> you have a "hook" in the
> FileReader constructor so you can pass a function as
> an argument. Second, I
> think it shows that you can get the contents of the
> url using the read
> function. But it's hard for me to absorb, even
> though there's barely 1kb of
> code alltogether.
>
Well I guess your correct not much thought was put
into it's design. Maybe something like:
var fl = new FileReader();
fl.OnInit(function(){
// this function is called
// once the filereader object has been
// initialized
var url = 'mypage.html';
var rt = this.read(url);
})
How about the above? Is it more intuitive?
--
Raymond Irving
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-help
