Yeah, I know, I read your posts and liked'em. It's not like I was claiming property to the idea (if I did I would be violating the GNU lisence I figure). I was instead hoping for some sort of collaboration, that's all...
 
And don't count yourself out that fast. So what if you don't know DynAPI like forward and backwards in your sleep - I sure don't. Everybody working on the development now, had to start somewhere, and if you ask me there's no better way to practice than to be working yourself up with a new project. When you come to the point (and it's not to far away if you practice commited to the task) where things actually begins to work you will be amazing yourself over and over - that's the joy of development.
Putting focus at the end of the line and setting up pitstops actually works - however cliche it  might seem. If you just lock focus on your goal, no matter that you have constantly rework the pitstops along the way you will at least come to achive something.
Of course there's times when you can't or don't have fit the time or enthusiasm to keep it active, but those time you just put it on ice and get back to it in time or you'll eat up the passion of it.
 
Henrik V�glin [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
----- Original Message -----
From: rlb
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 7:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Help] DynAPI RAD proposal [ was Re: DynBuilder proposal ]

Henrik,

Some comments,

First off, I've e been thinking along the same lines as your self all along, I put them to this list back in Dec. I just haven't been vocalizing like you.
 I don't have enough experience with DHTML or DynAPI (YET) to contribute significantly, but I'm definitely on the sidelines, cheering.
 
 --

bobb

http://64.33.167.222/
 

Reply via email to