At 11:29 04/05/2001, you wrote:
>Message: 2
>Message-ID: <006b01c0d420$7c327f20$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: "Steve Carroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>References: <002701c0d3ff$ab6c3310$74087986@cappuccino>
>Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 15:29:09 -0700
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Subject: [Dynapi-Help] Macintosh Issues IE 4.5 & Netscape 4.01
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=help>
>List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-help>,
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe>
>List-Id: <dynapi-help.lists.sourceforge.net>
>List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-help>,
>
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive: <http://lists.sourceforge.net/archives//dynapi-help/>
>
>I've isolated the problem with Mac IE 4.5. It seems that the 'for in' is not
>supported. By simply changing this in the 'include ' functionality, Mac
>users under IE 4.5 and Netscape 4.0 (not even in the matrix) can gain
>compatibilty? Is it worth anything to anyone? Shouldn't we include it?
>
>Regards,
>Steve
I thought it was clear for everyone that using "for .. in ..." just to make
loops on arrays was NOT the right way. If (like I do) you add a function to
Array.prototype, this function will be used in the "for ... in" statement
as an element of the loop (so this way you make a loop on "1, 2, 3, 4,
foo() { alert('bar") }, ...."
So please, could someone eliminate all the "for...in" from the source code.
(Someone on my request did it in the past (thanx to him), but it seems that
other people weren't warned about this point, and added it back to DynAPI 2.5x)
Sincerly,
Marc
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-help
