To build on this question:
Are we going to completely re-design the object model?
I am not going to document the current version if the docs will be obsolete
a week later..

IMHO if any attempt is made to re-design the object model,
it should be done in a new branch (why not use DynAPIX branch)
until such a time as the new model has been proven as an advancement.

A Show of hands?
I am not afraid of anything new, I just don't want to abandone what works
until
the new idea is proven. I will even help with the new branch as I too
believe that
we could be squeezing so much more out of this.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yariv Alter Fin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:27 PM
Subject: [Dynapi-Help] ...util.debug.js


> Hi there,
>
> Does anyone knows of any syntax examples for the dynapi.util.debug.js
usage?
>
> ... and for that matter, is there a complete DynAPI methods syntax
> dictionary? my bet is that it's not yet around, but it sure could
> speed things up putting the api into pratice which is so very
> important if it is indeed to become 'the future of dhtml' as we all
> would like to see...
>
> TIA,
>
> Yariv
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Help mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-help


_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-help

Reply via email to