To build on this question: Are we going to completely re-design the object model? I am not going to document the current version if the docs will be obsolete a week later..
IMHO if any attempt is made to re-design the object model, it should be done in a new branch (why not use DynAPIX branch) until such a time as the new model has been proven as an advancement. A Show of hands? I am not afraid of anything new, I just don't want to abandone what works until the new idea is proven. I will even help with the new branch as I too believe that we could be squeezing so much more out of this. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yariv Alter Fin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:27 PM Subject: [Dynapi-Help] ...util.debug.js > Hi there, > > Does anyone knows of any syntax examples for the dynapi.util.debug.js usage? > > ... and for that matter, is there a complete DynAPI methods syntax > dictionary? my bet is that it's not yet around, but it sure could > speed things up putting the api into pratice which is so very > important if it is indeed to become 'the future of dhtml' as we all > would like to see... > > TIA, > > Yariv > > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Help mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-help _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-help