On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Josh Stone <jist...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 04/25/2016 10:58 AM, Bill Williams wrote: >> I think what we want to maintain, at least for 9.x, is the following >> guidelines: >> >> * No "using namespace" in public headers (foo/h/*.h); "using foo::bar" >> may be used but prefer typedefs if you want to clean up overly long >> namespace chains >> * Any of "using namespace foo", "using foo::bar", and "foo::bar" is >> acceptable in private headers and source files (foo/src/*.[hC]). "using >> foo::bar" or explicit "foo::bar" at point of use is preferred in the >> absence of typedefs; typedefs and auto are the preferred options we >> should trend towards in new code. >> * If you're already touching a type, you may replace it with the most >> preferred form (typedefs and auto to hide implementation details). >> * If you see something unacceptable, fix it. >> >> This sound good to folks? > > Works for me.
What's the status of this patch then? Should I make modifications or is it fine as-is? Thanks, Peter _______________________________________________ Dyninst-api mailing list Dyninst-api@cs.wisc.edu https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/dyninst-api
