Hi Thomas, I am working with an improved jump table analysis. Its prototype is available at my Dyninst fork ( https://github.com/mxz297/dyninst/tree/jump_table_multi_slices). This improved version should be merged back to mainstream Dyninst in the near future. Could you try my version to see whether it solves your problem? If the problem remains, could you provide me the problematic binary so that I can further improve my code?
Thanks, --Xiaozhu On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Thomas Dullien <thomasdull...@google.com> wrote: > Hey all, > > I am using DynInst for a small project that helps search for similar > flowgraph in a search index (https://www.github.com/thomasdullien/ > functionsimsearch) > and noticed that most switch statements that it encounters are not > handled properly (e.g. the control flow reconstruction fails to resolve > the switch targets). > > Where in the source code should I go looking for the relevant code? > I'd love to have a look around to see if it can be improved. > > Cheers, > Thomas > > _______________________________________________ > Dyninst-api mailing list > Dyninst-api@cs.wisc.edu > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/dyninst-api > >
_______________________________________________ Dyninst-api mailing list Dyninst-api@cs.wisc.edu https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/dyninst-api
