Hi, what are y'all thoughts on building Dyninst with a TBB other than
intel-tbb, specifically intel-oneapi-tbb ?
Spack has three providers for the virtural tbb: intel-tbb,
intel-oneapi-tbb and the full intel-parallel-studio. I get the sense
that intel-tbb is older, to be phased out in favor of intel-oneapi-tbb.
I tried this in spack and the build failed with:
$ spack install dyninst ^intel-oneapi-tbb
-- Searching for tbb...
-- Hints:
/home/krentel/tbb/install/linux-fedora26-x86_64/gcc-7.3.1/intel-oneapi-tbb-2021.2.0-t5wd6nm6yz26cs2l6bwfhmuvbo5gke6a/lib
/home/kre
ntel/tbb/install/linux-fedora26-x86_64/gcc-7.3.1/intel-oneapi-tbb-2021.2.0-t5wd6nm6yz26cs2l6bwfhmuvbo5gke6a
-- Could NOT find TBB (missing: TBB_INCLUDE_DIRS TBB_LIBRARIES tbb
tbbmalloc tbbmalloc_proxy) (Required is at least version "2018.6")
CMake Error at cmake/ThreadingBuildingBlocks.cmake:99 (message):
TBB not found and cannot be downloaded because build is sterile.
Call Stack (most recent call first):
CMakeLists.txt:30 (include)
The directory layout is totally different with intel-oneapi-tbb, but
that might be the main or only issue.
So, do you want dyninst to be buildable with intel-oneapi-tbb?
Is it worth the effort?
Do you suspect any issues beyond directory layout?
You want me to file a issue?
Thanks,
--Mark
_______________________________________________
Dyninst-api mailing list
Dyninst-api@cs.wisc.edu
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/dyninst-api
