Tristan Petersen wrote:
> Number 20 is awsome!
Deen Foxx wrote:
> I have to agree--that is the best. But, it is aimed at merchants, not
> consumers.
>
>From my perspective, e-gold needs a few more merchants more than it needs
a few more consumers. The whole process of bringing users to the gold
economy is a catch-22. Most consumers won't come into the gold economy if
there aren't a lot of merchants. Most merchants won't come into the gold
economy if there aren't a lot of consumers. However, a merchant will bring
more consumers than a consumer will bring merchants.
Viking Coder
________________
Worth Two Cents?
http://www.2cw.org/VikingCoder
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
