> Craig,
>
> > Their position,
> > whichever it is, is certainly justifiable.
>
> Interesting way to put it... You agree no matter what the position is,
> is that what you mean by that?
>
> Eric
My guess is that he means no matter what their position, it is
justifiable.
If e-gold decides to disclose who bailed in the gold, then they can
provide 'proof' that bailment of metal is actually more than just a
contractual agreement which is much ballyhooed but rarely, if ever,
tested.
If e-gold decides to not disclose who bailed in the gold, then they can
provide 'proof' that e-gold is dedicated to privacy, and won't disclose
transaction information to settle a perennial discussion.
Personally, I prefer the second one.
Viking Coder
________________
Worth Two Cents?
http://www.2cw.org/VikingCoder
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
