yeah, here's the whole thing!


>http://www.systemics.com/legal/affidavit.txt
>
>
>+-----------+
>                   IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT
>|REGISTRAR's|
>                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE             |
>OFFICE
>|
>                             ANGUILLA CIRCUIT                    |
>9.55am
>|
>                                 (CIVIL)                         |MAY
>25
>2001|
>                                A.D. 2001                        |
>ANGUILLA
>|
>
>+-----------+
>
>Claim No. 2001/0039
>
>BETWEEN:
>
>                                DIGIGOLD.NET LIMITED
>                                                        Claimant
>
>                                AND
>
>                                SYSTEMICS INC.
>                                IAN GRIGG
>                                                        Defendents
>
>
>            AFFIDAVIT OF BARRY DOWNEY IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR
>                                INJUNCTION
>
>I, BARRY DOWNEY, of One W. Pennsylvania Ave. Suite 950, Baltimore,
>Maryland
>21204, being duly sworn MAKE OATH and say as follows:
>
>1. That I am attorney at law, admitted to practice in the State of
>Maryland,
>and
>The United States Counsel to DigiGold.net Ltd, the Plaintiff herein.
>In
>addition, I also represent some of the shareholders of the
First-named
>Defendant Company. I have full knowledge of certain information
>relevant to
>this suit and am duly authorised to make this Affidavit in support of
>the
>Plaintiff's application for an injunction against the Defendants.
>
>2. The Defendant Company, Systemics Inc. is a Nevis corporation. The
>Defendant Ian Grigg is the principal shareholder of the Defendant
>Corporation, its Software System Manager and one [sic] the
Programmers
>of
>the
>said Corporation.
>
>3.  In or about August 1999 the Plaintiff, a Nevis Corporation,
>entered
>into a software licence agreement with the said Defendant Company,
>Systemics Inc. whereby the Defendant Company would developed [sic]
>under the software license [sic] a product that is a gold backed
>digital cash called "DigiGold".  The DigiGold digital cash can be
>traded against other financial instruments using the Market Server
>developed by the Defendants.  The Plaintiff pursuint to the Agreement
>funded this development.
>
>
>4. A further Agreement between the parties provided that the
Plaintiff
>and
>its
>shareholders are entitled to 25% of the shares in the Defendant
>Corporation.
>A
>copy of the said Software Licence Agreement is exhibited herewith and
>labelled "BD1" for identification.
>
>5. The Market Server and the server hosting the software and related
>products
>are housed and operated in Anguilla.
>
>6. Pursuant to the agreement the Plaintiff has provided funding on
"as
>needed"
>and "as requested basis" under this Agreement.
>
>7. The total funds that have been sent by the Plaintiff Company and
>its
>shareholders over the two-year period are approximately
US$370,000.00.
>As
>far as the Plaintiff is aware, this is the total funding that the
>Defendents
>have
>received from all sources.
>
>8. The Second named Defendant, made his last request for funds in May
>2000.
>Thereafter, the Plaintiff made several attempts to get him to ask for
>additional
>funds, but in October 2000, the Second Defendant, as agent of the
>First-
>Named Defendant, indicated for the first time that the relationship
>between
>the
>parties had changed and he did not think he could continue working
>with
>Plaintiff [sic].
>
>9. The Plaintiff has made several attempts to get the Defendants to
>accept
>additional funding, but the Second-named Defendant either did not
>respond to
>these requests or indicated that he had made other commitments and
did
>not
>know if he could continue to support the projects and would let the
>Plaintiff
>know. The plaintiff has made attempt after attempt to enter into
>discussions
>to
>resolve the dispute without results. A copy of the e-mailed
>correspondence
>is
>exhibited herewith as a bundle and labelled "BD2" for
indentification.
>
>10. On May 21, 2001, the Second named-Defendant sent a notice to the
>Plaintiff
>that precipitously terminates the support for DigiGold and indicates
>that
>the
>DigiGold server will be taken offline as of Friday, May 25, 2001.
>
>11. This termination will cause immediate and irreperable damange to
>the
>Plaintiff
>and to all persons who hold any balance of the digital cash DigiGold.
>The
>Defendants intend and will exclude [sic] DigiGold from the Market
>Server.
>
>12. "DigiGold" has been operational in beta form for over one year.
>This
>digital
>cash has been sold over this period and a substantial amount of the
>digital
>cash
>is outstanding in the market that will be rendered useless if the
>DigiGold
>server is pulled offline and the software support is discontinued.
>
>13. The Plaintiff has repeatedly confirmed its willingness to
continue
>funding the
>project under the software license but to no avail. The Plaintiff
will
>escrow
>the funding if necessary to confirm its commitment to fulfil its
>obligations
>under the said license.
>
>14. The intervention of the Court is unfortunately necessitated to
>prevent
>the
>termination of the support for the Digigold digital cash and the
>exclusion
>of
>Digigold from the Market Server. This will allow the parties to
>immediately
>begin arbitration or other appropriate legal proceedings to resolve
>this
>dispute
>and to either continue the Plaintiff's relationship with the
>Defendants or
>obtain the DigiGold and Market Server software and hardware necessary
>for it
>to take over the support and development of these projects.
>
>15. We ask the Court to issue an immediate injunction that Because
>[sic] the
>Defendants repeatedly have asserted how easy it is to remove
>themselves from
>legal process by "jumping a plane to the next Island", and because
the
>software and hardware cannot function without the Second-named
>Defendant's involvement or without his first providing sufficient
>training
>to
>Plaintiff, Plaintiff also asks the Court to exercise its jurisdiction
>over
>the
>Defendant and prevent his flight from Anguilla.
>
>16. Accordingly I respectfully ask that this Honourable Court grant
>the
>Plaintiff's
>application for an injunction restraining the Second named Defendant
>whether
>by himself of [sic] by any of his servants or agents or any of them
or
>otherwise
>from terminating support for the DigiGold project or from taking the
>server
>off-line or from removing the software or hardware from this
>jurisdiction
>and
>further, that the Second-named Defendant be restrained from leaving
>the
>jurisdiction of Anguilla.
>
>17. Insofar as the content of this Affidavit is within my personal
>knowledge, it is
>true and insofar as it is not within my personal knowledge, it is
true
>to
>the best
>of my knowledge, it is true to the best of my knowledge, information
>and
>belief. [sic]
>
>SWORN to by the within-named              )                  ( B D )
>BARRY DOWNEY                              )
>________________________
>This 25th day of May 2001                 )                BARRY
>DOWNEY
>                                          )
>                                          )
>Before me:                                )
>
>             (Tracie Marie Nye)
>             __________________
>             Notary Public
>
>             TRACIE MARIE NYE
>      NOTARY  PUBLIC  STATE  OF  MARYLAND
>      My Commission Expires August 2,2004
>


-----------------------------------------------------------
"Great ventures create great mottos."


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to