Craig Spencer wrote:
>
> Strictly speaking the problem is not that they are unidentified. It is
> that they are criminals. Identification may filter out some of the
> criminals but it does not filter out all of them and it interferes
> with some perfectly legitimate business.
>
A broader view encompasses the definition of "crime" and "criminal".
And who is in charge of interpreting those definitions.
History has a long list of criminals who were never accused of a crime but
instead were publicized as heros or demi-gods. Usury is legal is some countries
but illegal in others just as are prostitution, so-called money laundrying, etc.
A crime in one jurisdiction (arena of specific defining and definition use) may
not be a crime in another.
An interesting dilema for e-gold is "Whose definitions are they going to use?"
Why? How are they going to be implemented? Where? At what cost and especially
"By whom?"
--
Life, Love and Laughter,
Dale Pond
Sympathetic Vibratory Physics
Sacred Science - Sacred Life
http://www.svpvril.com
SVP Discussion Forum:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svpvril/
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
