At 2001-08-22 16:09 +1000, David Hillary wrote:
>I feel more secure in my interest in e-gold than goldmoney because I know
>that the trustees are legally responsible to fulfill the trust deed more
>than I care that I might own nominal title to some part of a bar somewhere
>(but no where specific).

Dear Mr. Hillary

I am compelled to respond to your comment about GoldMoney and the comparison to e-gold.

Your observation about trusts is correct, and the trustees are responsible to fulfill 
the trust deed.  Therefore, the following provision of  the e-gold Bullion Reserve 
Special Purpose Trust is important as it limits the responsibility of Hildeberto de 
Frias and Michael Mello (the Trustees).

quote
6.2 The Trustees shall not be held liable for any breach of duty or loss or damage to 
any third party caused by virtue of or a result of any distribution made pursuant to 
the dual signed instructions from e-gold and the Escrow Agent.
unquote

The term "any third party" includes e-gold users, so this loophole relieves the 
trustees of their obligation if anything goes wrong with e-gold.  In other words, the 
e-gold users have no recourse to the trustees.

Further, the Escrow Agent Agreement contains a similar loophole.  It states that 

quote
2. e-gold Ltd. is solely responsible for ensuring that the [...gold in the vault...] 
is sufficient to meet the requirement under the currency contracts for 100% physical 
reserves backing all e-metal in circulation, and neither the Custodians [the vaults] 
nor the Escrow Agent have any liability with respect to this requirement.
unquote

Thus, the 'fine print' of the trust agreement and the escrow agreement establish that 
neither the trustees nor the escrow agent have any responsibility to the e-gold users, 
and that responsibility is solely with e-gold.  I assume that you were not aware of 
these loopholes before making your comparison to GoldMoney.  Further, I would like to 
correct your comment above.

We very clearly disclose where the gold in GoldMoney is stored.  The bars are stored 
in London in the vault owned and operated by VIA MAT International Ltd.  Further, not 
only were these storage arrangements reported by our auditors, Deloitte & Touche, in 
their recent review (see: 
http://www.goldmoney.com/public/about_goldmoney/governance.html), but Deloitte also 
confirmed that there is a one-to-one relationship between GoldGrams in users' Holdings 
and grams of gold in the vault.

As the inventors of digital gold currency, we studied both before and after we filed 
our first patent application in Feb 1993 various alternatives to make the process of 
online gold payments work efficiently, while still providing the user with maximum 
protection and security of his assets.  We considered the use of a trust, but decided 
against this structure for several reasons.  Some of these are:

First, it adds a layer of expense, which we have eliminated in GoldMoney and explains 
in part why our fee structure is less than e-gold (our payment fees are only 1/10th of 
e-gold and our storage fees are 1/2 of e-gold).  Second, the trust separates the user 
from his gold, which has been a major problem of gold currency systems historically.  
Money substitutes (promises to pay gold) have always proven to be inferior to money 
(gold coins) itself.

Our objective therefore has been to build an online payment system that uses money, 
and not a money substitute.  We have done this with GoldMoney because all the users 
own their gold that circulates as currency within GoldMoney.  GoldMoney is the 
electronic equivalent of a gold coin.  We have also provided users with a sound 
structure to provide assurances of integrity: (1) the system was designed and built by 
Dimension Data, a world-class firm that has built online systems for banks, (2) the 
gold is stored in a first class vault by one of the world's leading storage firms, VIA 
MAT International, (3) increases and decreases of GoldGrams in the system are 
completed by an established commercial trust firm, Euro-Dutch Trust Company, and (4) 
our auditors, Deloitte & Touche have provided assurances of integrity that everything 
is working as it is supposed to work.

I hope that you find the above disclosure to be useful .

James Turk


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Did you know that e-gold Ltd. stores more gold on behalf of customers
than many countries? See http://www.gold.org/Gra/Gra1.htm and the
e-gold Examiner at http://www.e-gold.com/examiner.html for details.

Reply via email to