At 04:46 PM -0500 12/02/2001, CDK wrote: ... >- Anonymize.net >- Anonymizer.com >etc. >We do this as we think it's a paradigma in itself that privacy driven >services don't accept e-gold as payment.
... Actually, and oddly enough, Anonymizer has an e-gold account. The reason they've never had success with it is that despite being founded by one of the best programmers I've ever known, they were unwilling to automate the process of getting anonymizer with the e-gold SCI. I was (and still am) shocked by this, since virtual goods like anonymizer or hushmail accounts or what have you can be delivered securely and instantly while drinking rumdrinks on a beach (I'm doing that NOW! Superclubs rocks!). They apparently wanted to inject a human in the process (and the consequent delays) for some reason. They also do not take advantage of the e-gold originator program, which gives half the spend fees away. I have logical explanations for none of this, but humans aren't always logical creatures. Oh well. Time for another Cuban cigar! WooHoo!!! :^) JMR PS -- 2 gram reward for anyone who tells me the name of the now- defunct cypherpunk remailer I used to co-run with my pal Joey Grasty. --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gold.com/stats.html lets you observe the e-gold system's activity now!
