RJ LeVeque wrote: >I have seen sites STOP using e-gold and when asked why, this is their >reasoning; "Too easy to access pay for services". Most webmasters would >rather drop it and wait for more secure options... or... use other >eCurrencies. > I have a lot of trouble with this statement.
E-Gold and GoldMoney both have a backend confirmation system. It takes the same programming skills to implement the public side as the backend side. I have done extensive work on implementing various payment systems integration tools. The ones provide by E-Gold and GoldMoney are absolutely the best out there. If you want to look an an insecure system look at OsGold's interface. There is no hash validations and no backend system. This is the NORM from what I have seen. And lets not forget about Paypal's bogus interface. The only way they handle payments is by email! You can also take a look at the credit card industry. Want to talk to them be ready to shell out some bucks for proprietary sofware and you still have to be a programmer to implement it. I don't know what you have against E-Gold, but your comments about the SCI being insecure don't hold water. Vince Callaway FreedomHound.com --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gold.com/stats.html lets you observe the e-gold system's activity now!
