On 23 May 2002, at 15:16, Kenneth C. Griffith wrote:

> I'm sorry, Claude and Patrick, but CLEAR TITLE requires 100% ownership
> of a distinct assett so there are no questions of ownership.  This is
> a legal term.  If you and several other people each have an undivided
> interest in something, none of you has clear title to that thing. 

Well I am sorry Ken... we will agree to disagree. And furthermore, 
by saying this you disagree will all the lawyers and notaries in 
Canada and I am sure elsewhere. 

In my life, I have for our justice department... and registered many 
clear titles with undivided interested that I know what I am talking 
about. I would be surprised the laws have changed since then.

Claude

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) 
via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common 
viruses.

Reply via email to