Dear JP,

> compare to a pint bottle of wine (or milk) which is about 
> a pound.

A pint's a pound the world around.  That is, 16 fluid ounces
of water is exactly, by definition, a pound of water.  Thus
there are 8 pounds of water in a gallon.  These are pounds
avoirdupois, not pounds troy.  Non-medicinal consumables
are measured in pounds avoirdupois, not in pounds troy.

Metals are measured in pounds troy.  Black's Law Dictionary
5th Edition says, "troy weight, a weight of twelve ounces
to the pound, having its name from Troyes, a city in Aube,
France."  Avoirdupois is given as, "The name of a system 
of weights (sixteen ounces to the pound) used in weighing
articles other than medicines, metals, and precious stones,
so named in distinction from the Troy weight."  Oh, that's
helpful.  

Avoir is the French word "to have;" du is French for 
"from the" and "pois" is "peas."  So, literally, this pound
avoirdupois is the "pound to have from the peas" rather
than the pound from Troyes.  Kinda cool.  Unless you have
to eat a whole pound of peas at a sitting.  Peas are not
very dense.  (Denser than water? I dunno, do they float?)

Now, about that rhyme, "a pint's a pound the world around."
Easy to remember that a pint weighs a pound, until you ask
"a pint of what"?  If you have a pint-sized stone, you'll
find that it weighs a good deal more than a pound.  If it
is a dense stone, such as granite, it might weigh five or
more pounds.  The density matters.  The density of water is
defined as one.  The density of stone varies a great deal
by the stone, but is about five in many cases.  So the
weight in pounds is the volume in pints times the density.

What about that pound of gold?  Well, I have no feeling
for the size of a pound avoirdupois of gold.  A pound troy 
of gold is the size of a stack of twelve gold one ounce 
coins, more or less.  (Rims and stamped features may make
the stack of coins a little taller than a solid pound would
be.)

Would that pound weigh the same as a pound of silver? Yes.
A pound troy is a pound troy.  So, if I have a silver 
one ounce coin, can I get the same measurement of volume
by simply stacking up twelve of these, or multiplying the
height of this silver coin by twelve?  Not directly.

Silver, of course, is less dense than gold.  So, if you
have a stack of 12 silver coins, the volume is greater
than a stack of 12 gold coins.  By how much?  By the
relative densities of silver and gold.  

The specific gravity of silver is 10.50 at 20 degrees
Centigrade (about 68 Fahrenheit for you Johnny Rebs)
gold at the same temperature has a specific gravity of
about 18.88.  So the stack of gold coins should be smaller
than the stack of silver coins.  How much smaller?  Left
as an exercise for the reader.

If the specific gravity of water is one, by definition
I gather, then the specific gravity of gold tells us that
a pound avoirdupois of gold is just more than one-nineteenth 
the size  of a pint of water.  Wow.  I still have no feel
for how big that is, but it isn't huge.

Oh, and, by the way, the density of water itself is at a
maximum at about 4 degrees C.  If the temperature is lowered,
water crystallizes, and as we know, ice floats.  If the
temperature is raised, the density drops, so warm water 
goes up as well.  This creates an interesting economic
opportunity in tropical latitudes, where there is surface
water at perhaps 35 C and deep water a thousand meters
down which is at 4 C.  Enough temperature differential to
run a thermal cycle engine, an "ocean thermal energy
conversion" or OTEC system.

While we're considering interesting facts from the 62nd
Edition of the Chemical Rubber Company handbook, here are
a few more: gold becomes liquid at 1064.43 degrees C
and a vapor at 3080 C.   Silver melts at 961.93 C and
vaporizes at 2212 C.  (What are these temperatures in
Fahrenheit degrees?  Remember that 0 C is 32 F and 20 C
is very near 68 F.  Knowing the zero, and that there
are 100 centigrade degrees for the 180 Fahrenheit degrees
between freezing and boiling water, you should be able
to work the answers out.)

Sterling silver is not pure silver!  Yes, "pounds sterling"
are not pounds (troy) of pure silver.  Rather, sterling is
an alloy of 92.5% silver the remainder typically copper.

Silver is the best known reflector of visible light, and is
a poor reflector of ultraviolet.  Its use in analog 
photography is well known, but it has much less use in 
digital photography.

"In 1939, the price of silver was fixed by the US Treasury
at 71 cents per troy ounce, and at 90.5 cents per troy
ounce in 1946."  From this sentence, Ibid., we see that
attempts to fix prices tend to discourage production and
lead to shortages which inevitably force the price up.

"In November 1961 the US Treasury suspended sales of 
nonmonetized silver, and the price stabilized for a time
at about $1.29, the melt-down value of silver US coins.
The Coinage Act of 1965 authorized a change in the 
metallic composition of the three US subsidiary 
denominations [half, quarter, tenth (dime)] to clad
or composite type coins.  This was the first change
in US coinage since the monetary system was established
in 1792." (Source: 62nd Chemical Rubber Company Handbook.)

And thus flagrantly unconstitutional.  In 1982, the
penny ceased to be 95% copper and 5% zinc and became
mostly zinc with a tiny amount of copper on its 
outside.  Electrodeposition?  I'm not sure.

Has the debasement of the coinage reached its nadir?
Not hardly.  Last I checked, the nickel was 75%
copper and 25% nickel, and will probably be debased
to zinc with a nickel coating.  Those halves, quarters,
and dimes are copper in the center; presumably that will
change to zinc by and by.

Recently, I saw a big bag of Boggs Sacajawea dollars
made from plastic.  It is certainly cheaper to make
tokens from plastic than to mint coins.  But, base
metals like aluminum (aluminium to you Brits) have
yet to be tried in the USA.  I think I've seen an
India rupee coin which was aluminum.

Just more proof that politicians and bankers cannot
be trusted with your money.

Regards,

Jim
 http://goldbarterholdings.com/


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) 
via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common 
viruses.

Reply via email to