>> Think about it though Jim - what you and presumably Craig are saying >> is that e-gold take their spend fees / storage fees (read the >> following two words carefully) *as gold* as opposed to *as e-gold* > >Essentially, yeah, but they probably have an e-gold account which is not >listed when considering liabilities. > >The point of this message, though, is that I just don't see why it matters. >They're just providing information in the Examiner, whether they're listing >THEIR account with their liabilities, or otherwise.
To be clear, they're certainly not OBLIGATED in any sense to explain it - or indeed, to do anything! They can and should run business however they want! Again, though. it's simply speculation unless someone states what the excess is, man.... --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.
