From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> [1]  PC!  there are actually numerous **very good reasons** that the
> e-gold act 808081 might have more e-gold in in than the sum of all
> 1mdcGrams balances at that minute.

Good.  Then there are numerous very good reasons that the Trust might have
more gold in it than the sum of all e-gold balances at that minute.  We
agree.

(I only said "put all the gold in e-gold accounts" because you insisted that
(1) There could be no Other Liabilities and (2) There could be no Equity.
Putting everything in e-gold accounts would follow logically from that.)


> ... your assertion about accounting metatruths is just daft man, sorry!)

It's not a metatruth.  It's just the way balance sheets are DEFINED.

When you say "oh, it's neither Liability nor Equity, it's just Slop" -- now
THAT's a metatruth.  I never saw the "Slop" category in my accounting
textbook.

    Assets = Liabilities + Equity + Slop.

Nope, I don't like it.  I prefer the traditional definition.


> I see no astonishing reason that the extra gold **MIGHT NOT** belong
> to e-gold holders.
>
> That would be totally, totally, totally, totally, totally normal.


Good.  Then who owns the extra gold is literally none of our business.  The
Trust is not a public company, so they have no obligation to disclose their
full balance sheet.


-- Patrick


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) 
via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common 
viruses.

Reply via email to