Patrick Chkoreff wrote: ... > 7. I believe that neither e-gold, Ltd. nor the E-Gold Special Purpose Trust > will issue a full accounting of the extra gold. To be more specific, by > midnight GMT of 06-Jun-2003, there will still be no answer. If I am wrong, > I will pay 10 gg to Jim Ray's personal account. Consider that a bribe. >
Not that I mind this (excellent) idea of paying Jim Ray to do absolutely nothing, but why am I being mentioned? I barely ever may have known anything about the numbers involved in this debate, and I recall thinking "that's nice," and forgetting why this or that balance did not match up perfectly. If it's numbers, I'm not the guy to ask! I like the new Examiner, I think it's cool to know about all the bars, but I doubt I'll look at it all that much in a few months. Stats is more interesting to me! That's all I want to say!! You folks talk and talk about this issue, and meanwhile all sorts of interesting things (like that Planetgold interview with Mr. Fedotov of Webmoney!) go un-noted. I think it's a bit odd, but that's the way of email lists I guess... JMR PS No shocker that Snowdog noticed Examiner first! ;) --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.
