Does "dismissed without prejudice" mean that GoldMoney has the option to bring the suit again at a later date?
If it is so crystal clear that e-gold is infringing upon the GM patent, then why does GM require a stay in order to prove it? It should have been pretty simple if GM actually had a legitimate case. --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.
