> Well... it's still queens or better, though they did implement some sort of > delay preventing a bot from playing too many hands too fast. They also fail to > mention that I also lost money from time to time, but overall the bot did > indeed win.
There's no reason a bot should win. Even their version of Jacks or Better takes more than the Vegas versions. There are no profitable games there. They should be happy to have a bot play as many hands as possible, even if every hand gives the bot an additional chance to win the bar. The bar is only being given because they hope to win more money from those playing. The more a bot plays, the more they should win -- bar or no bar. > In fact, the expected payout given optimal play is about 101.2%. Of course a > human would not play perfectly, bringing it below 100% (and that's why they > probably offer it), but of course a computer can... And playing lots of hands > minimizes the risk of loosing money. It's only 101.2% if played with the payouts in Vegas -- not at TheGoldCasino.com. Craig --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.
