> That would be a more-iffy case. Another, which nobody has
> mentioned in this debate, is the case of *****Sucks.com
> domains.
I was actually debating taking up your wager with regards to
cocacolaforum.com.
If it were a site for consumer and/or investor speach, it would
be just as well protected as cocacolawatch.com or
cocacolasucks.com.
I won't because it has absolutely nothing to do with the point
I was making.
Adam
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold
account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke
loggers and common viruses.
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s)
via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common
viruses.
