Dear Khurram,

Hi, Khurram. I do like e-gold, much better.

E-gold doesn't make any claims about being "backed" by gold.
It is redeemable for gold, rather than "backed."  As far as
I can tell "backed" is a red flag which says that the
currency operator doesn't have a clue.

E-gold doesn't offer information on gold it has bought.
Neither does INTGold.  Graham Kelly has some information
he claims was faxed to him from INTGold which he purports
is receipts for gold purchases, which I gather he thinks
means that INTGold still owns this gold.  Most of my
questions which you've posted silly comments about relate
to the fact that receipts for gold purchases are not
in any way comparable to information about gold stored
in a vault.

There are people who have been to the vaults in Zurich,
London, and Dubai.  You can read about Julian Dibbell's
experiences in Dubai in his essay in _Wired_ magazine
from a few years back.  Just go to their web archive.

In contrast, INTGold doesn't appear to have an allocated
gold storage contract anywhere.  They don't appear to
make any claim to be storing this gold which Graham
thinks they've purchased.  Maybe they've already sold
the gold?  Maybe they just faked up the receipts.

Not sure... have the e-gold people posted any information
to prove that their gold is lien-free?

Yes. Feel free to review the user agreement and the e-gold statements on the special purpose trust, as well as their contract with, say, JP Morgan for allocated bullion storage.

If you are saying e-gold should hire some company to
perform a serious audit, I agree.  I'd like to see a
detailed audit of the e-gold system.

But can I run a SQL statement on their database to verify this?

I don't know if you can or cannot. I gather you don't have their permission to do so.

You could ask Jay Wherley to do so, but he'd probably just
refer you to the stats page.

I'm not promoting INTGold or anything.

Swell.


 But you're saying that one
eCurrency isn't any good because it hasn't provided the necessary
information.  At the same time, the one you like hasn't provided any
information either.

Actually, the amount of information available on the e-gold.com site is huge compared to the amount of data I gleaned from the INTGold site last time I was there. You really ought to stop being silly and just take a look.

Things I like about e-gold:
  There seems to be gold involved.
  E-gold management aren't promoting Ponzi schemes.
  E-gold has contracts for storage of gold.
  E-gold has information on gold in storage.
  Doug Jackson is a nice guy.

I cannot say any of these things about INTGold based on
knowledge or belief.

Regards,

Jim
 http://www.ezez.com/


--- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.

Reply via email to