Dear Joseph,

Your comments on grammar, usage, and idiom, are
delightful to me.  I do get so tired of being the
only pedantic usage maven here.

the lack of public fundamentals leaves us with bald
publicity as our only means of judging TGC's worth.

I disagree. I own no shares, but I do post the occasional link to TGC: http://8715605.thegoldcasino.com/

My thoughts on judging them are: look at their casino.
It has thousands of users who have placed millions of
bets, and the bets have paid off.  What more do you
really need to know?

Look at JP May's reports on the dividends.  He's
such a stinker, JP, he can't resist shouting every
time he gets honking big dividends from these guys.
Imagine how much happier he'll be when Gold Barter
Holdings starts posting dividends.  (GBH has posted
profits each quarter this year.  I think it is up
$12.5K or so.  Dividends at year end should be in
the offing.)

If they pay dividends, what else do you need from
them?

I wouldn't want to bet the farm on good publicity
either.

I would urge you not to bet the farm ever. For example, you could have looked at the detailed financials, filings, 10Ks, annual reports, and audit documents for, say, Enron, or, say, Worldcom. With that kind of documentation, many people have apparently felt comfortable betting a lot of their future wealth. And gotten nowhere.

His example was the phrase "Have a seat." He speaks
flawless English and he still thinks it sounds stupid.
"You mean I can have it? Oh, you mean sit in the chair."

No, he's confusing usage with grammar. The idiomatic expression "have a seat" refers to the use of the chair, not the chair itself. It is equivalent to "be seated" which might be something he would find more...comfortable.

When he sits in the chair, he is taking a seat. He is
also taking a seated position.  He has that seat, for
his use, for a time.  It might be fun for some lady to sit
on his lap, but she would have his lap for a seat, not the
chair.  The simultaneity principle as applied to buttocks
is...frame dependent. <smile>

It just isn't possible for two sets of buttocks to be
in the same seat at the same time.  If there is room
for two sets of buttocks, then one chair provides two
seats.  The seat in this idiom, then, is not the chair,
but the position or location of the...base...fundament...
posterior.

See also http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=seat
especially usage #3.

Regards,

Jim
 http://www.ezez.com/


--- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.

Reply via email to