------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/jyXolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

"In February 2003, astronomers involved in the
search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI)
pointed the massive radio telescope in Arecibo,
Puerto Rico, at around 200 sections of the sky.
The same telescope had previously detected
unexplained radio signals at least twice from
each of these regions, and the astronomers were
trying to reconfirm the findings. The team has
now finished analysing the data, and all the
signals seem to have disappeared. Except one,
which has got stronger. This radio signal, now
seen on three separate occasions, is an enigma.
It could be generated by a previously unknown
astronomical phenomenon. Or it could be something
much more mundane, maybe an artefact of the
telescope itself. But it also happens to be the
best candidate yet for a contact by intelligent
aliens in the nearly six-year history of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] project, which uses programs running as
screensavers on millions of personal computers
worldwide to sift through signals picked up by
the Arecibo telescope." - Source 
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996341


Mysterious signals from light years away 
 
  
19:00 01 September 04 
  
Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition.
Subscribe and get 4 free issues. 
  
In February 2003, astronomers involved in the
search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI)
pointed the massive radio telescope in Arecibo,
Puerto Rico, at around 200 sections of the sky. 

The same telescope had previously detected
unexplained radio signals at least twice from
each of these regions, and the astronomers were
trying to reconfirm the findings. The team has
now finished analysing the data, and all the
signals seem to have disappeared. Except one,
which has got stronger.

This radio signal, now seen on three separate
occasions, is an enigma. It could be generated by
a previously unknown astronomical phenomenon. Or
it could be something much more mundane, maybe an
artefact of the telescope itself. 

But it also happens to be the best candidate yet
for a contact by intelligent aliens in the nearly
six-year history of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] project, which
uses programs running as screensavers on millions
of personal computers worldwide to sift through
signals picked up by the Arecibo telescope. 


Absorb and emit 


�It�s the most interesting signal from
[EMAIL PROTECTED],� says Dan Werthimer, a radio
astronomer at the University of California,
Berkeley (UCB) and the chief scientist for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] �We�re not jumping up and down, but we
are continuing to observe it.�

Named SHGb02+14a, the signal has a frequency of
about 1420 megahertz. This happens to be one of
the main frequencies at which hydrogen, the most
common element in the universe, readily absorbs
and emits energy. 

Some astronomers have argued that
extraterrestrials trying to advertise their
presence would be likely to transmit at this
frequency, and SETI researchers conventionally
scan this part of the radio spectrum.

SHGb02+14a seems to be coming from a point
between the constellations Pisces and Aries,
where there is no obvious star or planetary
system within 1000 light years. And the
transmission is very weak. 

�We are looking for something that screams out
�artificial�,� says UCB researcher Eric Korpela,
who completed the analysis of the signal in
April. �This just doesn�t do that, but it could
be because it is distant.�


Unknown signature 


The telescope has only observed the signal for
about a minute in total, which is not long enough
for astronomers to analyse it thoroughly. But,
Korpela thinks it unlikely SHGb02+14a is the
result of any obvious radio interference or
noise, and it does not bear the signature of any
known astronomical object.

That does not mean that only aliens could have
produced it. �It may be a natural phenomenon of a
previously undreamed-of kind like I stumbled
over,� says Jocelyn Bell Burnell of the
University of Bath, UK. 

It was Bell Burnell who in 1967 noticed a pulsed
radio signal which the research team at the time
thought was from extraterrestrials but which
turned out to be the first ever sighting of a
pulsar.

There are other oddities. For instance, the
signal�s frequency is drifting by between eight
to 37 hertz per second. �The signal is moving
rapidly in frequency and you would expect that to
happen if you are looking at a transmitter on a
planet that�s rotating very rapidly and where the
civilisation is not correcting the transmission
for the motion of the planet,� Korpela says. 

This does not, however, convince Paul Horowitz, a
Harvard University astronomer who looks for alien
signals using optical telescopes. He points out
that the [EMAIL PROTECTED] software corrects for any
drift in frequency.


Fishy and puzzling 


The fact that the signal continues to drift after
this correction is �fishy�, he says. �If [the
aliens] are so smart, they�ll adjust their signal
for their planet�s motion.�

The relatively rapid drift of the signal is also
puzzling for other reasons. A planet would have
to be rotating nearly 40 times faster than Earth
to have produced the observed drift; a
transmitter on Earth would produce a signal with
a drift of about 1.5 hertz per second. 

What is more, if telescopes are observing a
signal that is drifting in frequency, then each
time they look for it they should most likely
encounter it at a slightly different frequency.
But in the case of SHGb02+14a, every observation
has first been made at 1420 megahertz, before it
starts drifting. �It just boggles my mind,�
Korpela says.

The signal could be an artefact that, for some
reason, always appears to be coming from the same
point in the sky. The Arecibo telescope has a
fixed dish reflector and scans the skies by
changing the position of its receiver relative to
the dish. 

When the receiver reaches a certain position, it
might just be able to reflect waves from the
ground onto the dish and then back to itself,
making it seem as if the signal was coming from
space. 

�Perhaps there is an object on the ground near
the telescope emitting at about this frequency,�
Korpela says. This could be confirmed by using a
different telescope to listen for SHGb02+14a.


Possible fraud 


There is also the possibility of fraud by someone
hacking the [EMAIL PROTECTED] software to make it return
evidence for an extraterrestrial transmission.
However, SHGb02+14a was seen on two different
occasions by different [EMAIL PROTECTED] users, and those
calculations were confirmed by others. 

 
Then the signal was seen a third time by the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] researchers. The unusual
characteristics of the signal also make it
unlikely that someone is playing a prank, Korpela
says. �As I can�t think of any way to make a
signal like this, I can�t think of any way to
fake it.�

David Anderson, director of [EMAIL PROTECTED], remains
sceptical but curious about the signal. �It�s
unlikely to be real but we will definitely be
re-observing it.� Bell Burnell agrees that it is
worth persisting with. �If they can see it four,
five or six times it really begins to get
exciting,� she says.

It is already exciting for IT engineers Oliver
Voelker of Logpoint in Nuremberg, Germany and
Nate Collins of Farin and Associates in Madison,
Wisconsin, who found the signal. 

Collins wonders how his bosses will react to
company computers finding aliens. �I might have
to explain a little further about just how much I
was using [the computers],� he says.
 
  
Eugenie Samuel Reich

     

        Related sites:

  SETI At Home Project
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/



  Arecibo telescope
http://www.naic.edu/




        
                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 

 

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/E-MAIL_TRIVIA/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to