Hi, I'm sending the dump off-list - I'm not sure what that memory dump contains.
Matyas On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, Fujinaka, Todd wrote: > Did I ever ask for a register dump? The best is if you could use ethregs > (from e1000.sourceforge.net if it's not on your system already). > > Thanks. > > Todd Fujinaka > Software Application Engineer > Networking Division (ND) > Intel Corporation > todd.fujin...@intel.com > (503) 712-4565 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matyas Koszik [mailto:kos...@atw.hu] > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:10 AM > To: Fujinaka, Todd > Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] ixgbe: All RX packets go to rx_missed_errors (fwd) > > > > Hi, > > Yes I understand the workings of this list and that's fine, and I'm grateful > for any help I receive - I just wanted to know if it's worth waiting or not. > > Regarding the counters, this server was working fine for about 20 days, and > those received packets accumulated during that interval. Since the bug hit I > only see dropped packets: > RX packets:70913218139 errors:0 dropped:5205446 overruns:0 frame:0 > > > Matyas > > On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Fujinaka, Todd wrote: > > > Sorry, but everything on this mailing list is best effort. Please contact > > your vendor for official support. There's no SLA here, and no tracking. > > > > CentOS is not a supported OS, though it is similar enough to RHEL that > > things should be working. > > > > All attachments are stripped on the mailing list. I would suggest creating > > a bug on e1000-bugs (also on sourceforge) if you're sending attachments. I > > found the copy you sent me and you received 70913218139 packets and dropped > > 659298 packets. Are you sure you're not receiving invalid packets? > > > > Todd Fujinaka > > Software Application Engineer > > Networking Division (ND) > > Intel Corporation > > todd.fujin...@intel.com > > (503) 712-4565 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matyas Koszik [mailto:kos...@atw.hu] > > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 7:27 AM > > To: Fujinaka, Todd > > Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] ixgbe: All RX packets go to > > rx_missed_errors (fwd) > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm sorry but I won't be able to wait for much longer, so if you don't have > > the time to help me debug this issue I'll have to put the server back in > > production. > > > > > > Matyas > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 11:59:20 +0100 (CET) > > From: Matyas Koszik <kos...@atw.hu> > > To: "Fujinaka, Todd" <todd.fujin...@intel.com> > > Cc: "e1000-de...@lists.sf.net" <e1000-de...@lists.sf.net> > > Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] ixgbe: All RX packets go to > > rx_missed_errors > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > There're no logs at all related to the event (only the applications > > complained about the loss of connectivity). OS is centos 6.6, HW is > > supermicro X8DAH with 2xE5645. > > > > I've attached the output of (ifconfig eth5;ethtool -S eth5;sleep > > 10;ifconfig eth5;ethtool -S eth5). > > > > > > Matyas > > > > On Wed, 7 Jan 2015, Fujinaka, Todd wrote: > > > > > I think we'll need more details. Statistics from ethtool and any relevant > > > messages from dmesg and /var/log/messages would be good. What's the > > > hardware and OS? > > > > > > Todd Fujinaka > > > Software Application Engineer > > > Networking Division (ND) > > > Intel Corporation > > > todd.fujin...@intel.com > > > (503) 712-4565 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Matyas Koszik [mailto:kos...@atw.hu] > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 8:10 AM > > > To: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net > > > Subject: [E1000-devel] ixgbe: All RX packets go to rx_missed_errors > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > I have an X520 nic which just completely stopped processing RX packets > > > all of a sudden - only rx_missed_errors and rx_bytes_nic are increasing > > > on the rx side. Flow control is enabled on the NIC and disabled on the > > > switch. I didn't reboot or reconfigure the interface so it can be > > > debugged further, for which I would like to ask your help. I've also > > > noticed something strange, which may or may not be related: the ifconfig > > > statistics for the interface in question show 0 TX bytes/packets, but it > > > seems to be working fine on the vlan subinterfaces. > > > > > > The driver version is 3.19.1-k. > > > > > > > > > Matyas > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > > > -------- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go > > > Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership > > > with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software > > > development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, > > > case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation > > > now. > > > http://goparallel.sourceforge.net > > > _______________________________________________ > > > E1000-devel mailing list > > > E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel > > > To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit > > > http://communities.intel.com/community/wired > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
