It probably varies from part to part. You'll have to read every datasheet and 
spec update to make sure.

Depends on how much this matters to you, but there's a lot of history there. 
The datasheets are all publically availably and the easiest way to find them is 
with google. You must also read the spec update as it outlines any bugs we 
found in the hardware.

Todd Fujinaka
Software Application Engineer
Datacenter Engineering Group
Intel Corporation
todd.fujin...@intel.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Gilbert [mailto:dgilb...@liveaction.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2018 6:36 PM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E1000-devel] Total missing/dropped packets

I'm trying to find a generic way to account for all missing packets in linux 
kernel e1000e, igb and ixgbe drivers. It appears devices implement which stats 
are incremented differently. Would it be fair to say that rx_dropped + 
rx_missed_errors + rx_fifo_errors would give me the total number of missing or 
dropped packets? Or are their other stats I should be looking at also?

Thanks

-Dan Gilbert


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech 
sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot 
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit 
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit 
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

Reply via email to