With the help of some hardly documented switches in the pcm-pcie.x tool I
found out that indeed the majority of my DDIO traffic is a miss.

pcm-pcie.x -e -B

There is a huge variance - from 25% to over 90% of misses, but the average
ratio of DDIO miss is over 60%.

What could cause that?


On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 6:00 PM Michał Purzyński <michalpurzyns...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yet another post, but I'm almost there and I promise to publish yet
> another piece of documentation.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong but reading the
>
> UNC_IIO_DATA_REQ_OF_CPU.MEM_WRITE.PART0
>
> perf stat -e unc_iio_data_req_of_cpu.mem_write.part0 -C1 -r 3 sleep 1
>
> should tell me what the rate of DDIO misses is (i.e. card wrote to memory
> instead of the LLC).
>
> Now on a system with a dual Xeon Gold 6126 and 2x X710 (one per NUMA node)
> this number is huge. Either I'm misinterpreting results or there's a large
> number of DDIO misses - pretty much all of my traffic!
>
> The average traffic per port, at the time of measurement, was around
> 250Mbit and the DDIO misses were like 215Mbit.
>
> Either DDIO does not work or I'm looking at the wrong counter. Either way
> let me know.
>
> --
> Michal Purzynski
>
>

_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel Ethernet, visit 
https://forums.intel.com/s/topic/0TO0P00000018NbWAI/intel-ethernet

Reply via email to