Hi, On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:09:43PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2008-12-29 at 09:17 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > - acx100 (ok, that one is a bit mean to add to this list ;) > > > > What's that? > > > > Just resend everything, please, fulyl changelogged, with all necessary > > cc's. > > acx100 is legally challenged. We don't want to see it without a clear > and full indication by the authors that they can guarantee that it was > written without any copyrighted Texas Instruments material. Which > they've never bothered to provide.
True (and fully agreed), but then that particular entry was just meant to stir up some fog, I didn't really intend to focus on it at all ;) The project was based on non-clean-room reverse-engineering from the get-go anyway (5 people working for 3 months), thus the only way to get this unfortunate hardware non-support situation resolved would be by trying to get TI (or possibly newer holders of that technology) to extend its specifications/firmware blessing to older variants, not just the Android device-related chipsets supported by their new driver which they now provided, thankfully. Andreas Mohr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
