On Thursday, July 22, 2010, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:12:00 +0200, Florian Mickler said: > > > Attached patch moves the registering from e1000_up to e1000_open and > > the unregistering from e1000_down to e1000_close. > > It is only compile-tested as I don't have the hardware. > > My laptop has the hardware, so I tested it - system does indeed boot > without whinging about this issue. Feel free to stick in a: > > Tested-by: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> > > Thanks for the fast fix. :)
I'm going to add the patch to the suspend-2.6 tree. Any objections? > > From 693c71b911ff0845c872261d5704a1d40960722d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Florian Mickler <flor...@mickler.org> > > Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:44:21 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] e1000e: register pm_qos request on hardware activation > > > > The pm_qos_add_request call has to register the pm_qos request with the > > pm_qos > > susbsystem before first use of the pm_qos request via > > pm_qos_update_request. > > > > As pm_qos changed to use plists there is no benefit in registering and > > unregistering the pm_qos request on ifup/ifdown and thus we move the > > registering into e1000_open and the unregistering in e1000_close. Rafael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
