From: Richard Cochran <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 07:14:32 +0200
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 04:25:42PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > >> If these patches depend upon changes not in my tree, and you haven't >> even mentioned this, I'm going to be _extremely_ irritated. > > Sorry for being so irritating, and not being clear enough about > this. I did mention that > > Patch number 3 applies on top of my recent two igb/phc patches. > Patch number 12 applies on top of my recent e100 patch. > > Jeff accepted all of those 'recent patches' into his queue, so perhaps > he would take #3 and #12. > > Or should I just drop them for now? Yes, you can drop them and then send them later through Jeff once the infrastructure hits my tree. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
