On 04/26/2012 05:20 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > On 04/26/2012 05:05 PM, prasanna.panchamu...@riverbed.com wrote: >> From: Prasanna S. Panchamukhi<ppanchamu...@riverbed.com> >> >> Following logs where seen on Systems with multiple NICs& ports, >> while using MSI interrupts as shown below: >> >> Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:00:0d.0: lan0_0: NIC Link is >> Up >> 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX >> Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:40:0d.0: wan0_1: NIC Link is >> Up >> 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX >> Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:40:0d.0: lan0_1: NIC Link is >> Up >> 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX >> Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.warn kernel: 0000:40:0e.0: wan4_0: MSI interrupt >> test failed, using legacy interrupt. >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:00:0e.0: wan1_0: NIC Link is >> Up >> 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX >> Feb 16 15:09:33 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:00:0e.0: lan1_0: NIC Link is >> Up >> 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX >> Feb 16 15:09:33 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:00:0f.0: wan2_0: NIC Link is >> Up >> 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX >> Feb 16 15:09:33 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:00:0f.0: lan2_0: NIC Link is >> Up >> 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX >> Feb 16 15:09:33 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:40:0a.0: wan3_0: NIC Link is >> Up >> 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX >> Feb 16 15:09:33 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:40:0a.0: lan3_0: NIC Link is >> Up >> 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX >> Feb 16 15:09:34 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:40:0e.0: lan4_0: NIC Link is >> Up >> 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX >> Feb 16 15:09:34 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:40:0f.0: wan5_0: NIC Link is >> Up >> 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX >> Feb 16 15:09:34 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:40:0f.0: lan5_0: NIC Link is >> Up >> 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX >> >> This patch changes the IRQ tests to use polling loops starting with a >> delay of 1 tick and doubling that if necessary up to a maximum total >> delay of approximately 1 second. >> >> Signed-off-by: Prasanna S. Panchamukhi<ppanchamu...@riverbed.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 27 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++---- >> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > Thanks Prasanna, Dave did accept the previous patch, so does this patch > take that into account? No, If Dave has already accepted previous patch we can ignore this patch for now.
Thanks, Prasanna > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
