On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 15:08 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 02:49 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Ben Greear<gree...@candelatech.com>
> > Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 14:10:43 -0700
> >
> >> On 04/20/2012 02:56 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> >>> On 04/20/2012 02:21 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >>>> Thanks John for pointers to those.  Ben, are you running a kernel
> with
> >>>> these patches?
> >>>
> >>> I just tested this on my e1000e and igb machine.  With these
> patches,
> >>> I can no longer reproduce the problem.
> >>>
> >>> So, please make sure those are queued up for 3.3 stable!
> >>
> >> Dave:  I think these patches below should go to 3.3 stable.
> >>
> >> They are not queued for stable yet as far as I can tell.
> >
> > I let the Intel developers handle -stable submissions for their
> > drivers.
> 
> I don't think this is specific to their drivers.
> 
> But, as long as _someone_ is pushing it to stable,
> it is fine by me.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ben 

I will take care of the stable submission's Ben.

Cheers,
Jeff

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit 
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

Reply via email to