Thanks for taking it up. Let me know in case if you require any help from my side.
Rgds, Nishit Shah. On 6/6/2012 5:32 AM, Vick, Matthew wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Nishit Shah [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 11:43 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [E1000-devel] problem with simplified balancing on 82574 chips >> >> >> Hi, >> >> We are getting good amount of delay even on a normal ping when we >> set InterruptThrottleRate as 4 (simplified balancing) on 82574 chips. >> On >> the other side it is working properly with 82571,82572 and 82573 chips. >> Second issue is when we do ethtool -C eth0 rx-usecs 4, we require >> to do ifconfig eth0 down and up to have the effect whereas 82571,82572 >> and 82573 don't require it. >> > [...] >> Let me if you require more information on the same. >> >> Rgds, >> Nishit Shah. > Sorry for the delay. I'll take a look at your issues and get back to you as > soon as I can. > > Cheers, > Matthew > > Matthew Vick > Linux Development > LAN Access Division > Intel Corporation > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
