On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 06:15 +0400, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:43:58PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: Jeff Kirsher <[email protected]> > > Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:38:17 -0700 > > > > > Thanks! I have applied the patch to my queue > > > > Why? > > > > My impression is that this is a patch already in the tree, and it's > > being submitted for -stable but such minor performance hacks are > > absolutely not appropriate for -stable submission. > > The patch description says it is fixing reported oopses,
Exactly. > but the Subject: isn't all that helpful there. Well I just preserved the original subject from the upstream commit. Want me to resubmit with a more alarming one? > So which is this? Should I accept it for a stable release or not? IMO yes ;) Thanks, Roman. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
