On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:17:25 +0000, Vick, Matthew wrote: > Good catch on this, Jiri! I know the math works out the same, but I'd > prefer it if you changed the max_adj value to 999999999, since that is > technically what we can accept before we have any issues. If you re-submit > with this change, I'll add my ACK and we can run it through our internal > testing. Thanks!
But the real maximum value is actually 999999881, as anything higher than that would be capped to 999999881 by the driver. I don't think the driver should advertise higher max_adj than it is able to fulfill, otherwise there would be no need for the field. Jiri -- Jiri Benc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
