On 06/27/2013 05:25 PM, Cody P Schafer wrote: > On 06/24/2013 12:28 AM, Eliezer Tamir wrote: >> select/poll busy-poll support. >> ... > > I'm seeing warnings about using smp_processor_id() while preemptable > (log included below) due to this patch. I expect the use of > ll_end_time() -> sched_clock() here is triggering this. > > Apologies if this has already been noted.
To be clear, given how sched_time() is used here the BUG appears invalid, but we need a way to mark this as OK for the smp_processor_id() checks so we don't get BUG spam. > -- > > # [ 3.114452] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] > code: sh/62 ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
