> -----Original Message----- > From: Gert-Jan Roskam [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 12:35 PM > To: Richard Cochran; Vick, Matthew > Cc: [email protected]; linuxptp- > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [E1000-devel] 82576 and PTP: poll tx > timestamp timeout > > Op 14-8-2013 19:00, Richard Cochran schreef: > > Okay, if that is true, then increasing tx_timestamp_timeout (to 100 or > > 1000 for example) should allow 1.3 to work just as well. > > > > The only difference using poll is that the timeout is expressed in > > time (milliseconds) instead of "retries" as before. > > I changed the tx_timestamp_timeout to 100, the default was 1. > This seems to work, I saw no problems for the last 2 hours. > So now I can use the latest ptp code with the RJ45 port. > Thanks for helping me out. > > BTW. I have patches for the igb driver to let the 82576 chip generate a > 1pps signal. Is there interest to submit this code? > > Gert-Jan. > >
I don't think anyone here at Intel would mind. We never did it because there wasn't much demand (since most of the physical cards don't have the SDP pins exposed to enable routing the PPS anywhere) - Jake ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
