On Fri, 2013-09-06 at 06:28 +0000, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> On Sep 5, 2013, at 11:15 PM, "Stephen Hemminger" 
> <step...@networkplumber.org<mailto:step...@networkplumber.org>> wrote:
> 
> Dumb question why is this named Kbuild instead of Makefile like almost
> every other network driver?
> 
> All the new kids are doing it, we'll at least that is what I thought when I 
> made it.
> 
> Re-reading https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt
> 
> I see that Makefile is preferred but Kbuild overrides Makefile.
> 
> Either way works, but I would prefer not to rename it at this point but would 
> gladly do so in a follow up patch

Please do.

I suppose it makes _some_ sense to use Kbuild in the
include paths but I think Makefile in places where
compilations are done is better.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit 
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

Reply via email to