On (01/13/15 16:58), David Miller wrote:
> From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varad...@oracle.com>
> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:45:30 -0500
> 
> > On (01/13/15 01:08), Tantilov, Emil S wrote:
> >> Relaxed ordering was disabled due to an issue with some chipsets. There
> >> is a comment to that effect when enabling relaxed ordering for reads in
> >> ixgbe_update_tx_dca(). This was done back in 2011, so I'm still trying
> >> to dig through the details.
> > 
> > It would be helpful to know exactly which chipsets, so that in
> > those cases, we can set the ->enable_relaxed_ordering in my patch
> > to null (or make this setting specific to CONFIG_SPARC?)
> 
> I think they are talking about "system chipsets", ie. relaxed ordering
> doesn't work reliably on this or that AMD/Intel/whatever system
> chipset.

If that's what they have in mind (as opposed to some specific
set of ethernet controller) then we can #ifdef CONFIG_SPARC the
->enable_relaxed_ordering initialization?

--Sowmini


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit 
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

Reply via email to