On February 27, 2015 2:42:29 PM EST, "Nelson, Shannon" 
<shannon.nel...@intel.com> wrote:
>> From: nick [mailto:xerofo...@gmail.com]
>> On 2015-02-27 09:16 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote:
>> > On 27.02.2015 15:02, nick wrote:
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> >>>     i40e: Fix a bug where Rx would stop after some time
>> >>> [...]
>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
>> >>> index f7464e8..ff6d94d 100644
>> >>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
>> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
>> >>> [...]
>> >>> @@ -9169,6 +9178,13 @@ static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev
>*pdev,
>> const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>> >>>          if (err)
>> >>>                  dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "set phy mask fail, aq_err 
>> >>> %d\n",
>> err);
>> >>>
>> >>> +        msleep(75);
>> >>> +        err = i40e_aq_set_link_restart_an(&pf->hw, true, NULL);
>> >>> +        if (err) {
>> >>> +                dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "link restart failed, 
>> >>> aq_err=%d\n",
>> >>> +                         pf->hw.aq.asq_last_status);
>> >>> +        }
>> >>> +
>> >>>          /* The main driver is (mostly) up and happy. We need to set
>this
>> state
>> >>>           * before setting up the misc vector or we get a race and the
>> vector
>> >>>           * ends up disabled forever.
>> >>>
>> >>> With this hunk removed the driver successfully unloaded/reloaded
>a
>> >>> couple of hundred times. Would it be safe to just remove this
>hunk?
>> >>> I haven't seen any negative effects by removing this yet.
>> >>>
>> >>>   Stefan
>> >>>
>> >> Stefan,
>> >> I wouldn't remove them yet as this does look like a valid idea to
>> check to see if the link is
>> >> restarting successfully. On the other hand can you try removing
>the
>> msleep line as this one is
>> >> most likely causing the issue due to sleeping for some long in a
>> probe function is generally a
>> >> bad idea.
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Nick
>> >
>> > Thanks Nick for the quick reply. I tested removing the msleep but
>that
>> > didn't make a difference. You actually need to remove the complete
>> hunk
>> > to get a stable driver reload.
>> >
>> >   Stefan
>> >
>> Stefan,
>> Basically there are a few things that could be going wrong
>> 1. You are getting a error return for the
>> function,i40e_aq_set_link_restart_an
>> 2. You are trying to re able the device again when not needed
>> 3. You are sending a NULL value to a field for command arguments that
>> takes a 0 and not NULL
>> to take no arguments
>> Nick
>
>First of all, I would make sure you've got a short sleep in between
>each load and unload in this stress test.  There's a lot going on under
>the covers in the Firmware that really should be allowed to settle out
>before jostling it again with another load/unload command.  
>
>It would help to know what Firmware you have on your NIC - can you give
>us the output from "ethtool -i <ethX>"?
>
>The out-of-tree driver has just (finally!) been updated on SourceForge,
>so you might give this version 1.2.37 driver a try to see if it changes
>your result.  That code still has the hunk in question, but protected
>by a FW version check.  The related patch will be headed upstream to
>net-next very soon.
>
>Firmware updates have also just been released, but I'm not sure they've
>made it to the Intel Downloads site yet.  Updating your FW will make a
>difference.
>
>sln
Thanks Shannon, 
For the advice on there being a newer driver and firmware to test that on 
before reporting the bug against this driver. I am curious as to why this newer 
code is not up streamed to Linux next yet through. 
Nick
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit 
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

Reply via email to