On 06/25/2015 08:22 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> sorry. The patch is in the attachment. Please check it.
>
> Thanks a lot.
> Zhu Yanjun


Still no patch.  Any attachment is likely being stripped by the mailing 
list so I would recommend including it inline instead.

Also your explanation doesn't make much sense.  It isn't as though the 
layout of the frame should have an impact on the ICV result unless there 
is a bug in the IPSec protocol implementation that is causing it to pull 
in invalid memory.  I have tested IPSec tunnels over the ixgbe driver 
using AH and ESP and not seen any issues when sending larger frames. 
Are you perhaps using a third party protocol implementation?  Is it that 
implementation that requires frames be linear?

What we need is reproduction steps.  If you have some test that can be 
run to reproduce this issue then it would be much easier for us to 
understand it and find if your solution will work for any other cases 
that might be present.

- Alex


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager!
OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors 
network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms 
for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit 
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

Reply via email to