>-----Original Message----- >From: zyjzyj2...@gmail.com [mailto:zyjzyj2...@gmail.com] >Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2016 11:28 PM >To: zyjzyj2...@gmail.com; Tantilov, Emil S; Schmitt, Phillip J; Kirsher, >Jeffrey T; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; >Shteinbock, Boris (Wind River) >Subject: ixgbe: get link speed as a slave nic unrelated with link > > >Hi, Emil > >Thanks for your patch. >After I applied your patch, the following are the feedback from my users. > >" >Users had tested the latest patch that you provided and it is much improved >now. However it’s still not good enough as the users are planning field >deployment. Here are their findings: > >So close, but not quite 100%. I did run over 2500 re-negotiations on one >interface of a bonded pair and got the 0 MBps status total of three times. >The longest run without single error was something like 1800 re- >negotiations or so. So, this version seems to improve the situation >immensely (the unpatched driver fails like 25% of the time), but there >still seems to remain some tiny race somewhere.
Yes at the time of the bonding interface coming up there can be a message about 0 Mbps in dmesg, however the actual bond once fully up will have the correct speeds as seen by: #cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0 Thanks, Emil ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
