Emil,
At the moment my system is a hybrid mode.
The kernel version is 3.1 but userspace is older and doesn't support that.
Furthermore, I control other driver parameters like AtrSampleRate, Flow
Director, etc through modprove.conf file.
Other than that, are there any other differences I should look out for ?

Thanks,
Tal.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Tantilov, Emil S <emil.s.tanti...@intel.com
> wrote:

> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Tal Abudi [mailto:talab...@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 5:03 AM
> >To: Jarod Wilson <ja...@redhat.com>
> >Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Differences between out of tree and RH drivers
> >
> >Thanks Don and Jarod !
> >My area of responsibility is Multi Queue/RSS.
> >The first thing that popped up with the in tree kernel is that the RSS
> >configuration doesn't take place in modprobe.conf and the driver refuses
> to
> >load if sees an invalid options line.
> >
> >I see it as a major disadvantage to the driver and I would like to
> discover
> >the other differences as soon as possble.
>
> You can use the ethtool -L option to control the number of queues
> dynamically
> instead of the RSS parameter at load time.
>
> Thanks,
> Emil
>
>


-- 
Best regards,
Tal Abudi
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning
reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit 
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

Reply via email to