Perfect. Regards,
Dave 2009/1/27 Boris Bokowski <[email protected]> > Dave Orme wrote on 01/27/2009 03:03:33 PM: > > > ... > > Here's what I was wondering: Yves, would it be possible/desirable > > to make XWT map 1:1 to Hallvard's EMF model rather than straight to > > SWT? This seems like it might be a sensible approach to unifying > > both proposals. > > Wouldn't it be even better if there was a 1:1:1 mapping between an XML > representation, an EMF model, and SWT widgets? This would satisfy people who > don't want to have double the number of objects at runtime, but also enable > all the cool things you can do with EMF at development time with respect to > tools that operate on EMF objects. > > Dave Carver offered help producing a schema for XWT so that we could > generate an EMF model for it. See also the bug opened by Dave: * > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=260289*<https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=260289> > > Boris > > > _______________________________________________ > e4-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev > >
_______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
