Hi Yves,

That'd be a great demo to see at EclipseCon, it's a good idea.  Will you 
have time to work on such a demo?

I think the issues in the bug thread are orthogonal though, since it's 
about the relationship between semantics in the workbench model and any 
form of declarative styling (ie. I assume it's the exact same problem for 
XWT integration).

Regards,
Kevin





"Yves YANG" <[email protected]> 
Sent by: [email protected]
02/02/2009 09:55 PM
Please respond to
E4 Project developer mailing list <[email protected]>


To
"'E4 Project developer mailing list'" <[email protected]>
cc

Subject
RE: [e4-dev] CSS + Modelled UI: Need notion of active part






I think Declarative UI has more interaction with CSS. How about to start 
this integration with XWT + Modelled UI and prepare a nice demo together 
for EclipseCon? 
 
Best regards
Yves YANG
Soyatec - Eclipse OutSourcing & XAML for java
http://www.soyatec.com
Tel: +33 1 60 13 06 67
Mobile: +33 6 20 74 39 45
Fax: +33 9 58 07 06 67

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Kevin McGuire
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 2:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [e4-dev] CSS + Modelled UI: Need notion of active part
 

Eric suggested I forward this thread to the list.  I think it's an 
interesting problem because it's about meta information expressed at the 
level of the workbench (active part), manifest as styling via CSS (as 
changes in tab colors), and how we should communicate that. 

Those interested should comment in the bug so we can keep the thread 
together. 

Regards, 
Kevin 

----- Forwarded by Kevin McGuire/Ottawa/IBM on 02/02/2009 07:41 PM ----- 

[email protected] 
02/02/2009 03:47 PM 


To
Kevin McGuire/Ottawa/i...@ibmca 
cc
 
Subject
[Bug 263185] [CSS] Need notion of active part
 


 
 




https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=263185 
Product/Component: E4 / UI




--- Comment #2 from Eric Moffatt <[email protected]>  2009-02-02 
15:47:51 -0400 ---

This makes perfect sense to me. We most certainly don't want the CSS to be
against the 'focus' control but, as you say, the 'active part' (as defined 
by
some higher level entity (aka the workbench)...

I'm all for having the Model/CSS boundary managed by a separate piece of 
code
(bundle?), specific to this task. We should have enough information being
forwarded by the model to accomplish this fairly cleanly. This will allow 
the
us to freely 'play' with concepts in this area without affecting the other
(non-CSS aware) parts of the code.

We should perhaps take some time to discuss this on 'eclipse-e4'...


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You reported the bug._______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev

_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev

Reply via email to