Hi Hallvard, a) It looks like there's a Java-Class generated when looking at our model project.
b) Can you elaborate why you would want to have a dynamic EClass for e.g. ToolItem if you should creat a DirectToolItem or HandledToolItem? Tom Am 17.04.10 11:46, schrieb Hallvard Trætteberg: > On 17.04.10 05.23, yves (yingmin) yang wrote: >> I just noticed several classes become to abstract in workbench model >> such as ToolITtem, MenuItem etc. Are they expected? > > A quick follow-up: If an EClass is abstract, it cannot be used as the > direct superclass of a *dynamic* EClass, since there will no be > generated a Java class to instantiate. So, even if a class is logically > abstract, it should not always be marked as such. > > Hallvard > _______________________________________________ > e4-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev -- B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t EDV Systemhaus GmbH ------------------------------------------------------------------------ tom schindl geschaeftsfuehrer/CEO ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eduard-bodem-gasse 5/1 A-6020 innsbruck phone ++43 512 935834 _______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
