John, it may also be worth sending a note to whomever generates the email...I doubt that someone who's just been vetoed wants to see
"The PMC's comments were: Welcome" which in this case they may correctly interpret as "The PMC's comments were: Welcome (NOT!!)" :-) Perhaps something that points them back to the person that started the election for clarification might work ? Just another random thought, Eric From: John Arthorne/Ottawa/i...@ibmca To: E4 Project developer mailing list <[email protected]> Date: 11/30/2010 09:18 AM Subject: Re: [e4-dev] Committer vote for Stephan Herrmann has been vetoed by the PMC Sent by: [email protected] I'm really sorry Stephan. I was processing a large number of elections in the portal, and it looks like I didn't make a selection and it came through as a veto. I have asked the EMO to fix this up (as approved). John (red faced) John Arthorne/Ottawa/i...@ibmca Sent by: [email protected] 11/30/2010 09:03 AM Please respond to E4 Project developer mailing list <[email protected]> To [email protected] cc Subject [e4-dev] Committer vote for Stephan Herrmann has been vetoed by the PMC eclipse.e4 Committers, This automatically generated message marks the PMC's veto of the vote for Stephan Herrmann's full Committer status on the eclipse.e4 project. The PMC's comments were: Welcome If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your project lead, PMC member, or the EMO <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev _______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
_______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
