On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Lars Vogel <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I forgot why we decided that the org.eclipse.e4.rcp feature should not
> include the EMF plug-ins. Currently org.eclipse.e4.rcp adds
> org.eclipse.emf.ecore and org.eclipse.emf.common as dependencies.
>
> My personal preference would be to change the org.eclipse.e4.rcp
> feature and put org.eclipse.emf.ecore and org.eclipse.emf.common into
> the "Included features" part.
>
> This would make setting up Eclipse 4 application easier for new
> starters, they only have to add their features and one framework
> feature.
>
> Are there objections against this change? If not I will open a bug
> report with a patch.
>

Why does it need to be included?  We don't build/contain those feature in
our feature (we really do just depend on them), and as it is we don't peg
the versions of emf ecore and emf.common that often happens when including
features (we only care that they're at a minimum level)

PW


-- 
Paul Webster
Hi floor.  Make me a sammich! - GIR
_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev

Reply via email to